16 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Hey: the game name was suppose to be Edenism vs Fascism 3... |
16 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: lol |
16 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: good luck |
16 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: :P Wasn't paying attention. |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1901: interesting, RoxArt moved to Paris when I pulled this on him... |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: Slightly more aggressive play. ;) |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: it was easier to play against RoxArts defensive play :( |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: So I am playing 4 semi-live games at the moment, sorry if I am taking a while each move... |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: It's fine. |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: why the move to Paris? |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: I was expecting you to hold in Marseilles, and needed to get the +3 so my fleets could spare the forward position. |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: Should have gone for Venice, though, I had that selected until the last second. =P |
16 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1902: I assumed you were going for trieste, hence the hold... |
17 May 11 UTC | Autumn, 1904: grah making a number of bad decisions ._. |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: that large number next to your name scares me... |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: sorry, me and roxart are playing out the game we just drew, a what if scenario, where we post our theoretical orders to see who would have won the game if it continued |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: It shouldn't. ;P |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: I saw. You'd have won, support hold Budapest, Galicia hits Rumania, support yourself into Sevastopol. Budapest and London are traded (still 17-16) and then you take Sevastopol for #18. |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: well, it only needs to be one higher to give you the win, and you have Norway guarenteed... |
17 May 11 UTC | Spring, 1905: I have to cover prospective losses, though. |