28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Good luck to all! Russia already defined his orders? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: new at this haha. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: yes |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: How's the evening treating you gents? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: oh dear. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Greetings all - anyone care to make an alliance? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Excellent here. Nice breeze, 23:13 and still no sleep is coming. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: England, how would you run an effective alliance in a public press game? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Italy, care to support me into Moscow? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: England, I am willing to ally, do you wish to have an alliance that defends together or attacks together? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Certainly Germany, if I can have support later in the game. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Vie, how about a Supporting Spring, and an attacking fall... two years of mutual assistance? |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Sounds superb |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Team 1: England + Austria Team 2: Italy + Germany France, Russia, are you there? I feel lonely. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: - this is going to be fun. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: It seems you may need 4 to do this correctly - 1 attacks, 1 supports, and the other 2 bounce in the attackers space of origination. - of course with public messaging all someone has to do is support one of the bouncers in to mix things up a bit. --Good thing we have a lot of time to think about this |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: -- and of course no alliance of 4 can get to 2 dots each |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Nice analysis. I think the strategy would be to be able to agree a tactic with someone without the others realizing what you are up too. That would be an awesome display of subterfuge. I agree, good thing we have a lot of time to think about this. |
28 Mar 11 UTC | Spring, 1901: Errata: I think the *best* strategy would be... |
29 Mar 11 UTC | Autumn, 1901: Draw? :-) |