27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: Hello, wish you all good game, I hope everyone will enjoy it. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: Also good luck and good game from me. |
27 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: Hello all. Looking forward to trying this map out. |
28 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: GameMaster: NMR from France. Send the country in CD. |
28 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: GameMaster: Missing orders for Spring, 1601 (Diplomacy) from a country with 2 or more SCs. Extending phase.The game will continue after this phase even if you do not find a replacement. |
28 Sep 17 UTC | Spring, 1601: GameMaster: Someone has taken over France replacing "PwrXenon". Reconsider your alliances. |
30 Sep 17 UTC | Autumn, 1601: Can you imagine this map as fog of war? It would be crazy?! |
06 Oct 17 UTC | Spring, 1603: GameMaster: Someone has taken over France replacing "Fangorn". Reconsider your alliances. |
16 Oct 17 UTC | Spring, 1606: Fog of war should be an option for each map. |
16 Oct 17 UTC | Spring, 1606: I agree. I already asked mods a out that. They told me they are working on that. |
31 Oct 17 UTC | Gg, I'm sorry I needed to lie (especially to Ottoman), but you always have to try for solo, right? |
31 Oct 17 UTC | Yes, you do. |
31 Oct 17 UTC | The real problem come from the stupidity of the Ottomans. When Denmark and I propose a peace because it's obvious that Habsburg are trying for a solo, he agrees. But he doesn't respond to my messages about a coordination! And he decides to continue to attack me. So he doesn't defend him against Habsburg and let him a nice territory without armies to defend. This game is a WTA so have more SC is no a good motivation. So why? I don't want to reduce the Habsburg's victory, (he had won, congratulation!) but he was really help by the Ottomans! |