Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 132 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
JECE (1534 D)
20 Jul 18 UTC
The variant page is down. This is what I get:
Error triggered: A software exception was not caught: "syntax error, unexpected ''Ghana'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting function (T_FUNCTION)".
4 replies
Open
kaner406 (2061 D Mod (B))
10 Mar 18 UTC
(+4)
Bourse 2018
See below:
Page 3 of 7
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Technostar (1302 D)
19 Mar 18 UTC
Yay! I'm glad we were able to get enough interest to get this thing off the ground;
kaner406 (2061 D Mod (B))
20 Mar 18 UTC
(+1)
Ok folks, I've setup a new bourse spreadsheet, so I'll set up the game tomorrow and send invites then.
jason4747 (1633 D)
20 Mar 18 UTC
Kaner, I don't want to slow the game, so press on with a sub. I can't start until April 4th. So, please fill mine with a substitute. I will catch the next one. Cheers
kaner406 (2061 D Mod (B))
21 Mar 18 UTC
Ok, thanks Jason. I'm on the phone atm, but I've made the game so i'll send out invites tomorrow.
Technostar (1302 D)
21 Mar 18 UTC
@Kaner
Would you be willing to make the Bourse game anon?
How could that possibly work? Would the stock trades be by nation only too?
Technostar (1302 D)
21 Mar 18 UTC
Yes, stock trades would have to be made and reported by nation for an anon game. Since Kaner's the GM, he would be able to see who's who, so you could just PM him your Bourse orders like normal.
kaner406 (2061 D Mod (B))
22 Mar 18 UTC
The only thing at this stage I'm going to consider changing is whether or not to have rulebook press or not. In my mind having no communication in builds and retreats, and only being able to ready orders (no save) should speed up the build/retreats part.of the game (something that was a bit of a sore point in the last game).
Could we get a no process on weekends?
I second the no weekends request.
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
22 Mar 18 UTC
I'll third the no weekends.
Yeah, I think rulebook press makes sense for games with timers longer than a day. It's really noticeable in that three-day-turn Divided States game, being able to *not* ready your builds/retreats really, really drags the game out.
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
23 Mar 18 UTC
Absent a rock solid promise from all players to ready up retreats and builds I think I should drop out. The three day deadline is insanely long enough on a map that is going to go at least 25 game years. We have seen time and time again that players losing games will drag out retreats to the entire three days. At that pace we will be over a year without any delays, extensions, etc. I'm fine with three days turns, and I could live with no process weekends, but *only * if all 15 players agree to ready up orders or be kicked out of the game for abusing it.
cjuric (1771 D)
23 Mar 18 UTC
I'm in for a game of bourse. Wish you could change the length of each order phase individually like PlayDip but we work with the system we have. I'll endeavor to ready retreats rapidly.
kaner406 (2061 D Mod (B))
23 Mar 18 UTC
The game now has 2-day phases which will be shortened to 24 for retreats and builds when the bourse is published.
I'm out at 2 days unless there is no processing on weekends.
I will ready up builds and retreats.
cjuric (1771 D)
23 Mar 18 UTC
2 days works for me
I'm all for rulebook press and a ready-up policy, but I have to drop out with the 24-hr phases (even @ just builds and retreats), as it will occasionally put me at risk of NMRing. Apologies kaner, I know how difficult it is to put together parameters that work for everyone.
Technostar (1302 D)
23 Mar 18 UTC
I think the best solution is to have longer phases (either 2 days & no processing on weekends or 3 days) and enforce a ready-only policy for builds and retreats (so no entering build orders then unreadying them). Mods are able to force-process a game, so once Kaner has the Bourse results published and all players have orders in, he should force-process the game so we're not stuck for days on a retreat phase. This will give us sufficient time to negotiate, protect against NMRs, and prevent the game from dragging on during the retreat and build phases.
Good with readying up and rulebook. Any negotiation room between the 24 hour retreat/build folks and the 2 day folks eg 36 hour retreat/build phases?
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
23 Mar 18 UTC
Can't we just compromise at 2 or 3 days and have people agree not to be a delay douche on retreats and builds? If you need the time because you're off on the weekend getting fucked up and playing rock and roll (like Doc), no one cares. Otherwise just ready up and roll on. That way we can have 3 day negotiations without having game years that last up to 15 days.
^What he said.
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
24 Mar 18 UTC
I'm good with anything longer then 24 hours. I will ready retreats and builds unless it is 24 hours.
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
24 Mar 18 UTC
I'm good with anything longer then 24 hours. I will ready retreats and builds.
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
24 Mar 18 UTC
Ignore the first message.
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
24 Mar 18 UTC
I’m out at less than 3 day phases for negotiations. I can agree to ready up for builds and retreats, submit to 24-36 hr builds & retreats, rulebook press, and/or Mod enforced retreats/builds timing and all that.
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
25 Mar 18 UTC
Okay, let's try this another way. It's a special rules game already. We add one more very simple rule. Anyone signing up agree to ready up builds and retreats and not drag out the game for diplomatic, petulant, or strategic reasons. If the GM feels you are doing this, you will be replaced. It's so damn simple. All you need to do is respect the game and your fellow players. You literally have to try to be dick to break this rule, in which case there's really no defense. I'm fine with three hour turns, and a ready up agreement/rule. This kind of behavior should be the norm, and not something we actually have to debate.

Technostar (1302 D)
25 Mar 18 UTC
From what I have seen, the best arrangement (which should work for everyone) is as follows:
3-day phases
Rulebook press
Agree to ready all builds/retreats ASAP and to not unready those orders. GM can force the phase to process if everyone has retreats/builds in but someone has unreadied their orders.
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
25 Mar 18 UTC
I can also agree to Ruff’s “replace dickhead” rule.

Page 3 of 7
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

194 replies
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
09 Jul 18 UTC
(+2)
You can now access the server via https...
So friends in the same network can no longer spy on your network-traffic here to gain an advantage over you... :-)
9 replies
Open
Penguin_XX7 (1309 D)
14 Jul 18 UTC
Sitters for four games.
I need game sitters for 3 Gunboat games and one full press until July 24th. Please PM me.
1 reply
Open
Thanks to the winning thread, I lost The Game...
...and now you have too.

The perfect thread for all of us losers to post when we've lost. There can be no winners here.
7 replies
Open
Strider (1604 D)
09 Jul 18 UTC
Preview in fog of war
Why can't you preview your moves in fog of war? I understand that some features might need to be turned off for fog to work but it this required or just an acident.
6 replies
Open
Antiloquax (1287 D)
23 Jun 18 UTC
Why is the red box attacking me?
The red box on games with no saved moves is stressing me out! I have 2 days. What's the emergency?
23 replies
Open
Retillion (2304 D (B))
10 Jul 18 UTC
(+1)
A thick and ugly blue box
Please read below.
8 replies
Open
Enriador (1507 D)
22 May 18 UTC
(+4)
New Variants (yup, plural!)
Four new variants, based on Classic, will be coming to vDip!

Some of these were directly taken from the DP Judge. Others were lost in the Variant Bank for a long while.
28 replies
Open
RVG1984 (1169 D)
09 Jul 18 UTC
sealanes
How do they work?
15 replies
Open
Anonymous Games
Anonymous Games grant liars a shelter to do there worst, making abusive and absurd offered and generally making me passionately hate this game, which can lead to NMRs . Having to be out there means you have to have honor, and enables revenge. I have seen allies pitch in by hopping from one neutral territory to yhe next in the name of their promises. This site seems to be for the childish.
98 replies
Open
Flame (1073 D)
09 Jul 18 UTC
First Diplomacy game edition 1959
Who got the photo or scan of the first Diplomacy edition board (500 pieces), 1959? Please share to be used in an article.
7 replies
Open
nopunin10did (1041 D)
18 Jun 18 UTC
(+2)
Replace PPSC with something rank-based?
I've put together a length proposal over on PlayDip to provide a rank-based scoring system for draws that's similar to the Carnage system used in several North American Dip tournaments today.

https://www.playdiplomacy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=57975#p951166
103 replies
Open
Enriador (1507 D)
07 Jul 18 UTC
[New Variant] Machiavelli - To the Renaissance
New (official) subvariant of Machiavelli coming up on vDip. Not a single case of adjacent home centers - praise be God!

http://vdiplomacy.com/variants.php?variantID=115
0 replies
Open
Enriador (1507 D)
25 Apr 18 UTC
(+2)
New Variant: Crusades 1201
Hail diplomats,

New 11-players variant coming up, set in the High Middle Ages.
44 replies
Open
gremlin (994 D)
02 Jul 18 UTC
New Variants
Just curious, what is the process for creating new variants?
1 reply
Open
WiJaMa (1228 D)
26 Jun 18 UTC
Looking for game sitters
I'm looking for a game sitter for three games while I'm out from 1 Jul to 22 Jul. PM me for details.

Also, is there supposed to be a thread for these? I can't find it but the help page says there is one.
2 replies
Open
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
25 Jun 18 UTC
Strategy - Hold Order
See First Post
16 replies
Open
nopunin10did (1041 D)
12 Jun 18 UTC
(+2)
At long last: 1900
With some help from Tobias & Oliver, my implementation of Baron VonPowell's "1900" is finally live.

64 replies
Open
Matthew Goldman (965 D)
27 Jun 18 UTC
Looking for someone to take over my country (Not in a bad position)
Currently 13/35 countries remain and my country, Brazil, is in 8th place after some set backs with NMRs. Currently allied with the 2nd place country, Argentina, as a fight between the two of us will ultimately be the doom of our existence. Argentina has said that a substitute will not charge the alliance between our two countries.

Reply if interested in taking over.
3 replies
Open
RVG1984 (1169 D)
21 Jun 18 UTC
convert fleet to army
How do I convert a fleet to an army and the other way? I see people do it, but don't see the option on the dropdowns.
12 replies
Open
WaitingCynicism (903 D)
20 Jun 18 UTC
Notifications by email?
Is there a way I can get email notifications for my campaigns? I haven't gotten any at all, and because of that I've lost several games.
4 replies
Open
The Ambassador (2159 D (B))
17 Jun 18 UTC
(+1)
Padlock City
What's the deal with all the padlocks that have appeared throughout my games when viewed on the vDip homepage?
57 replies
Open
The Ambassador (2159 D (B))
27 Oct 17 UTC
1066 Tournament
As discussed in episode 23 of the Diplomacy Games podcast I'm thinking of putting together a 1066 tournament. Interested takers?
143 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
16 Jun 18 UTC
Would anyone like to join a Known World game?
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=35213
0 replies
Open
Frozen Dog (1472 D)
14 Jun 18 UTC
Playtest of variant
Hi! I am trying to organize a playtest of a variant I created with some unique rules that made it not possible to implement on vdiplomacy (yet!). I have called it 'Feudal Diplomacy'. [See below for details!]
3 replies
Open
ubercacher16 (2126 D)
12 Jun 18 UTC
Possible Change
See first post
10 replies
Open
Sky_Hopper (365 D)
12 Jun 18 UTC
(+1)
Game Showcase
Here, feel free to share any links to games that are notable to you!
10 replies
Open
CCR (1957 D)
13 Jun 18 UTC
Zero games variants
I thought I'd create a few games of the newest variants, and looked for those still not played, without opened games, or no new ones yet.
2 replies
Open
Mittag (1396 D)
09 Jun 18 UTC
Sandboxes?
Does anyone know any good adjudicator, online of for Mac, that I could use for playing around with positions?
7 replies
Open
Page 132 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top